Five public field notes · Practical review methods

Guides for work that still needs your judgment.

Choose a file format, audit a résumé claim, review an editable PowerPoint, turn a rough idea into a plan, or decide what a Project should remember.

Examples are fictional or sanitized product-QA material. No customer content, testimonial, adoption claim, or popularity ranking is presented.

  • 5 public guides
  • Evidence and limits included
  • Human review remains required
Ask Crump, an AI workspace for work that continues
Each guide identifies the workflow reviewed, the evidence used, and the checks a person still owns.
FIVE PUBLIC GUIDES

Choose the work in front of you.

The sequence moves from file decisions to claim review, presentation review, planning, and durable context. It is editorial—not a customer-usage ranking.

01 · WORD OR PDF Choose the right AI document output Use Word while work is moving, PDF after the reviewed layout is ready to travel, and inspect the actual file before handoff. Read the guide → 02 · RÉSUMÉ EVIDENCE Fact-check AI résumé bullets Audit the verb, scope, metric, causal claim, and interview story before a résumé reaches an application. Read the guide → 03 · EDITABLE POWERPOINT Use a seven-pass PowerPoint review Review story, evidence, charts, native elements, brand treatment, and accessibility in an exported PPTX. Read the guide → 04 · ROUGH IDEA TO PLAN Build a six-week launch plan See how a fictional brief with a deadline and budget became decisions, risks, milestones, and a next action. Read the guide → 05 · PROJECT MEMORY Decide what an AI Project should remember Choose which instructions, evidence, decisions, conversations, and files belong in durable Project context. Read the guide →